Abstract
Advocates of the science of reading have invoked the simple view of reading (SVR) to justify an approach that foregrounds decoding in early reading instruction. SVR describes reading comprehension as the product of decoding and listening comprehension. The current study examined the complexity of the SVR, focusing on the phonological and orthographic decoding in third-grade readers of Chinese. One hundred and forty-three students participated in this study. The measures included phonological decoding (pinyin invented spelling), orthographic decoding, listening comprehension and reading comprehension. Drawing upon regression analyses and multivariate path models, the study found that phonological decoding at both segmental and suprasegmental processing significantly predicted Chinese reading comprehension, yet a more significant effect of orthographic decoding surfaced. And the best-fitting model suggested listening comprehension was better characterized as a mediator rather than a covariance with decoding component in the decoding–reading relation when orthographic decoding was incorporated into decoding component to evaluate the validity of the SVR in Chinese. The results imply that orthographic decoding is a legitimate decoding component and that the two decoding constructs alone are insufficient for higher-level reading ability (reading comprehension) since the contribution appears to be mediated through the path route of oral language capacity (indexed by listening comprehension). This enriches the current understanding of the SVR in non-alphabetic languages and indicates that decoding training on both phonological and orthographic dimension should be highlighted in early Chinese reading instruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
References
Anthony JL, Francis DJ (2005) Development of phonological awareness. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14(5):255–259
Anderson RC, Li W, Ku Y, Shu H, Wu N (2003) Use of partial information in learning to read Chinese characters. J Educ Psychol 95(1):52–57
Babayi-ğit S (2015) The relations between word reading, oral language, and reading comprehension in children who speak English as a first (L1) and second language (L2): a multigroup structural analysis. Read Writ 28(4):527–544
Barron R (1980) Visual-orthographic and phonological strategies in reading and spelling. In: Frith U (ed) Cognitive processing in spelling. Academic Press, London
Barron R (1981) Development of visual word recognition: a review. In: Waller TG, MacKinnon GE (eds) Reading research: advances in theory and practice, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 119–158
Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107(2):238–246
Berninger VW, Abbott RD, Nagy W, Carlisle J (2010) Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. J Psycholinguist Res 39(2):141–163
Blachman B (1994) Early literacy acquisition: the role of phonological awareness. In: Wallach G, Butler K (eds) Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents: some principles and applications. Macmillan, New York, pp 253–274
Bowey JA (2001) Nonword repetition and young children’s receptive vocabulary: a longitudinal study. Appl Psycholinguist 22:441–469
Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp 136–162
Cadime I, Rodrigues B, Santos S, Viana FL, Chaves-Sousa S, do Céu Cosme M, Ribeiro I (2017) The role of word recognition, oral reading fluency and listening comprehension in the simple view of reading: A study in an intermediate depth orthography. Read Writ 30(3):591–611
Cain K, Catts H, Hogan T, Lomax R, Justice LM, Lomax R, O’Connell A, Pentimonti J, Petrill SA, Piasta SB, Gray S, Restrepo MA, Nielsen D, Bovaird J, Nelson JR, LARRC & Language and Reading Research Consortium (2015) Learning to read: Should we keep things simple? Read Res Q 50(2):151–169
Castles A, Nation K (2006) How does orthographic learning happen? In: Andrews S (ed) From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 151–179
Cervetti GN, Pearson PD, Palincsar AS, Afflerbach P, Kendeou P, Biancarosa G, Higgs J, Fitzgerald MS, Berman AI (2020) How the reading for understanding Initiative’s research complicates the simple view of reading invoked in the science of reading. Read Res Q 55(1):161–172
Chall JS (1996) Stages of reading development, 2nd edn. Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX
Choi W, Tong X, Cain K (2016) Lexical prosody beyond first-language boundary: Chinese lexical tone sensitivity predicts English reading comprehension. J Exp Child Psychol 148:70–86
Choi W, Tong X, Deacon H (2019) From cantonese lexical tone awareness to second language English vocabulary: Cross-language mediation by segmental phonological awareness. J Speech Lang Hear Res 62(6):1875–1889
Chow BW-Y (2014) The differential roles of paired associate learning in Chinese and English word reading abilities in bilingual children. Read Writ: Interdiscip J 27:1657–1672
Chung SC, Chen X, Geva E (2019) Deconstructing and reconstructing cross-language transfer. Verhoeven L, Segers E, van den Broek P (eds) J Neurolinguist 50:149–161
Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Ziegler R (2001) DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol Rev 108:204–256
Coltheart M (2005) Modeling reading: the dual route approach. In: Snowling MJ, Hulme C (eds) The science of reading: A handbook. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 6–23
Deacon SH, Pasquarella A, Marinus E, Tims T, Castles A (2019) Orthographic processing and children’s word reading. Appl Psycholinguist 40(2):509–534
Deng Q, Tong SX (2021) Suprasegmental but not segmental phonological awareness matters in understanding bilingual reading comprehension difficulties in Chinese and English: A 3-year longitudinal study. Ann Dyslexia 71(1):150–169
Ding Y, Liu R, McBride C, Zhang D (2015) PIS in mandarin Chinese-speaking children with and without reading difficulties. J Learn Disabil 48(6):635–645
Ding Y, Liu R, McBride CA, Fan C, Xu L, Wang J (2018) Pinyin and English invented spelling in Chinese-speaking students who speak English as a second language. J Psycholinguist Res 47(5):1163–1187
Ehri LC (1991) Learning to read and spell words. In: Rieben L, Perfetti CA (eds) Learning to read: basic research and its implications. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 57–73
Ehri LC (1992) Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In: Gough PB, Ehri LC, Treiman R (eds) Reading acquisition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 107–143
Ehri LC (1995) Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. J Res Read 18(2):116–125
Ehri LC (1998) Research on learning to read and spell: a personal-historical perspective. Sci Stud Read 2:97–114
Ehri LC (2005) Learning to read words: theory, findings, and issues. Sci Stud Read 9(2):167–188
Feng M, Sun D, Zhang Y (2021) Recognizing Chinese characters in peripheral vision: Different levels of processing of character. J Psycholinguist Res 50(2):275–291
Frith U (1985) Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In: Patterson K, Marshall J, Coltheart M (eds) Surface dyslexia. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 301–330
Frith U (1998) Literally changing the brain. Brain 121(6):1011–1012
Francis DJ, Fletcher JM, Catts H, Tomblin JB (2005) Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In: Paris SG, Stahl SA (eds) Children’s reading comprehension and assessment. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 35–49
Fletcher JM (2009) Dyslexia: the evolution of a scientific concept. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 15(4):501–508
Foorman BR, Petscher Y, Herrera S (2018) Unique and common effects of decoding and language factors in predicting reading comprehension in grades 1–10. Learn Individ Differ 63:12–23
Garcia JR, Cain K (2014) Decoding and reading comprehension: a meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Rev Educ Res 84(1):74–111
Gleitman LR, Gleitman H, Landau B, Wanner E (1988) Where learning begins: Initial representations for language. In: Newmeyer FJ (ed) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 150–193
Goswami U, Ziegler JC, Dalton L, Schneider W (2001) Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. J Mem Lang 45(4):648–664
Gough PB, Tunmer W (1986) Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial Spec Educ 7(1):6–10
Gough PB, Hoover WA, Peterson CL (1996) Some observations on a simple view of reading. In: Cornoldi C, Oakhill J (eds) Reading comprehension difficulties: processes and intervention. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 1–14
He Y, Wang Q, Anderson RC (2005) Chinese children’s use of subcharacter information about pronunciation. J Educ Psychol 97(4):572–579
Hjetland HN, Lervåg A, Lyster S-AH, Hagtvet BE, Hulme C, Melby-Lervåg M (2019) Pathways to reading comprehension: a longitudinal study from 4 to 9 years of age. J Educ Psychol 111(5):751–763
Hoover W, Gough P (1990) The simple view of reading. Read Writ: Interdiscip J 2:127–160
Hsuan C, Tsai HJ, Stainthorp R (2018) The role of phonological and orthographic awareness in learning to read among grade 1 and 2 students in Taiwan. Appl Psycholinguist 39(1):117–143
Hulme C, Snowling MJ (2013) Learning to read: what we know and what we need to understand better. Child Develop Perspect 7(1):1–5
Joshi RM, Tao S, Aaron PG, Quiroz B (2012) Cognitive component of componential model of reading applied to different orthographies. J Learn Disabil 45(5):480–486
Joshi RM, Aaron PG (2000) The component model of reading: simple view of reading made a little more complex. Read Psychol 21(2):85–97
Ju Z, Zhou Y, delMas R (2021) The contributions of separate pinyin skills and oral vocabulary to Chinese word reading of U.S. mandarin immersion third graders. Read Writ 34(9):2439–2459
Juel C, Griffith PL, Gough PB (1986) Acquisition of literacy: a longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. J Educ Psychol 78(4):243–255
Kim Y (2015) Language and cognitive predictors of text comprehension: evidence from multivariate analysis. Child Dev 86(1):128–144
Kintsch W (1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychol Rev 95(2):163–182
Kirby JR, Savage RS (2008) Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy 42(2):75–82
Knoepke J, Richter T, Isberner M, Naumann J, Neeb Y (2014) Phonological recoding, orthographic decoding, and comprehension skills during reading acquisition. Z Erzieh 17(3):447–471
Lervåg A, Hulme C, Melby-Lervåg M (2018) Unpicking the developmental relationship between oral language skills and reading comprehension: it’s simple, but complex. Child Dev 89(5):1821–1838
Li H, Shu H, McBride-Chang C, Liu H, Peng H (2012) Chinese children’s character recognition: Visuo-orthographic, phonological processing and morphological skills. J Res Read 35(3):287–307
Li WL, Jiang W, Shu H, Hong T, Anderson R (2016) The role of Pinyin in Chinese reading development. In: Li LW, Shu H (eds) The world of children’s reading, vol 3. Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing, pp 3–26
Lin D, McBride-Chang C, Shu H, Zhang Y, Li H, Zhang J, Aram D, Levin I (2010) Small wins big: analytic pinyin skills promote Chinese word reading. Psychol Sci 21(8):1117–1122
Liu L, Wang W, You W, Li Y, Awati N, Zhao X, Booth JR, Peng D (2012) Similar alterations in brain function for phonological and semantic processing to visual characters in Chinese dyslexia. Neuropsychologia 50(9):2224–2232
Liu Y, Liu D (2020) Morphological awareness and orthographic awareness link Chinese writing to reading comprehension. Read Writ 33(7):1701–1720
Lü C (2017) The roles of pinyin skill in English-Chinese biliteracy learning: evidence from Chinese immersion learners. Foreign Lang Ann 50(2):306–322
Luo C, Chen W, Zhang Y (2017) The inversion effect for Chinese characters is modulated by radical organization. J Psycholinguist Res 46(3):791–803
McBride-Chang C, Tong X, Shu H, Wong A, Leung K, Tardif T (2008) Syllable, phoneme, and tone: Psycholinguistic units in early Chinese and English word recognition. Sci Stud Read 12(2):171–194
Myers JL, O’Brien EJ (1998) Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Process 26:131–157
Nation K (2017) Nurturing a lexical legacy: reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. NPJ Sci Learn 2(1):3–4
Oakhill JV, Cain K (2012) The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Sci Stud Read 16(2):91–121
O’Brien BA, Mohamed MBH, Yussof NT, Ng SC (2019) The phonological awareness relation to early reading in English for three groups of simultaneous bilingual children. Read Writ 32(4):909–937
O’Connor M, Geva E, Koh PW (2019) Examining reading comprehension profiles of grade 5 monolinguals and English language learners through the lexical quality hypothesis lens. J Learn Disabil 52(3):232–246
Pan J, Song S, Su M, McBride C, Liu H, Zhang Y, Li H, Shu H (2016) On the relationship between phonological awareness, morphological awareness and Chinese literacy skills: evidence from an 8-year longitudinal study. Dev Sci 19(6):982–991
Peng P, Lee K, Luo J, Li S, Joshi RM, Tao S (2021) Simple view of reading in Chinese: a one-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Rev Educ Res 91(1):3–33
Perfetti CA (1992) The representation problem in reading acquisition. In: Gough PB, Ehri LC, Treiman R (eds) Reading acquisition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 145–174
Perfetti CA, Hart L (2002a) The lexical quality hypothesis. In: Verhoeven L, Elbro C, Reitsma P (eds) Precursors of functional literacy. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 189–213
Perfetti CA (2007) Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Sci Stud Read 11(4):357–383
Perfetti CA, Hart L (2002b) The lexical quality hypothesis. In: Verhoeven L, Elbro C, Reitsma P (eds) Precursors of functional literacy, vol 11. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 67–86
Perfetti CA, Tan LH (1998) The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. J Exp Psychol Learn Memory Cogn 24(1):101–118
Perfetti CA, Zhang S, Berent I (1992) Reading in english and Chinese: Evidence for a universal’ phonological principle: Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. Adv Psychol 94:227–248
Posnansky CJ, Rayner K (1977) Visual-feature and response components in a picture-word interference task with beginning and skilled readers. J Exp Child Psychol 24:440–460
Qu Q, Damian MF (2017) Orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: evidence from Chinese. Psychon Bull Rev 24(3):901–906
Rodrigues AP, Rebola J, Pereira M, van Asselen M, Castelo-Branco M (2019) Neural responses of the anterior ventral occipitotemporal cortex in developmental dyslexia: beyond the visual word form area. Invest Ophthalmol vis Sci 60(4):1063–1068
Seymour PH (1997) Foundations of orthographic development. In: Perfetti C, Rieben L, Fayol M (eds) Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 319–337
Shankweiler D, Fowler CA (2019) Relations between reading and speech manifest universal phonological principle. Annu Rev Linguist 5(1):109–129
Share DL (1995) Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 55(2):151–218
Share DL, Leikin M (2004) Language impairment at school entry and later reading disability: Connections at lexical versus supralexical levels of reading. Sci Stud Read 8(1):87–110
Shu H, Chen X, Anderson RC, Wu N, Xuan Y (2003) Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Dev 74(1):27–47
Shu H, Peng H, McBride-Chang C (2008) Phonological awareness in young Chinese children. Dev Sci 11(1):171–181
Siok W, Fletcher P (2001) The role of phonological awareness and visual-orthographic skills in Chinese reading acquisition. Dev Psychol 37(6):886–899
Song S, Georgiou GK, Su M, Hua S (2016) How well do phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming correlate with Chinese reading accuracy and fluency? A meta-analysis. Sci Stud Read 20(2):99–123
Sung JE, McNeil MR, Pratt SR, Dickey MW, Hula WD, Szuminsky NJ, Doyle PJ (2009) Verbal working memory and its relationship to sentence-level reading and listening comprehension in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology 23(7–8):1040–1052
Taft M, Zhu X, Peng D (1999) Positional specificity of radicals in Chinese character recognition. J Mem Lang 40:498–519
Tavassoli NT (2001) Color memory and evaluations for alphabetic and logographic brand names. J Exp Psychol Appl 7(2):104–111
Tavassoli NT (2002) Spatial memory for Chinese and English. J Cross Cult Psychol 33(4):415–431
The Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China (2011) Yuwen kecheng biaozhun (the criteria of Chinese curriculum). Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing
Tong X, McBride C (2014) Chinese children’s statistical learning of orthographic regularities: positional constraints and character structure. Sci Stud Read 18(4):291–308
Treiman R, Freyd JJ, Baron J (1983) Phonological recording and use of spelling-sound rules in reading of sentences. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 22(6):682–700
Tunmer WE, Chapman JW (2012) The simple view of reading redux: vocabulary knowledge and the independent components hypothesis. J Learn Disabil 45(5):453–466
van Daal VHP, Wass M (2017) First- and second-language learnability explained by orthographic depth and orthographic learning: a “natural” Scandinavian experiment. Sci Stud Read 21(1):46–59
Wang X (2010) The Cognitive Process Foundation of the Chinese Developmental Dyslexia with Phonological and Orthographic Deficit-Based on PASS Theory. Doctoral Dissertation. East China Normal University, China. http://www.cdmd.cnki.com.cn/
Wechsler D (1974) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Psychological Corporation, New York
Wong YK (2020) The relationship between orthographic awareness and Chinese reading in Hong Kong’s young CSL learners. ECNU Rev Educ (online) 3(4):678–693
Xiao H, Xu C, Rusamy H (2020) Pinyin spelling promotes reading abilities of adolescents learning Chinese as a foreign language: evidence from mediation models. Front Psychol 11:596680–596680
Yin L, Li W, Chen X, Anderson RC, Zhang J, Shu H, Jiang W (2011) The role of tone awareness and pinyin knowledge in Chinese reading. Writ Syst Res 3(1):59–68
Zarić J, Hasselhorn M, Nagler T (2021) Orthographic knowledge predicts reading and spelling skills over and above general intelligence and phonological awareness. Eur J Psychol Educ 36(1):21–43
Zhang D, Ke S (2020) The simple view of reading made complex by morphological decoding fluency in bilingual Fourth-Grade readers of English. Read Res Q 55(2):311–329
Zhang D, Koda K (2012) Contribution of morphological awareness and lexical inferencing ability to L2 vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among advanced EFL learners: testing direct and indirect effects. Read Writ 25(5):1195–1216
Zhang H (2015) Morphological awareness in vocabulary acquisition among Chinese-speaking children: testing partial mediation via Lexical inference ability. Read Res Q 50(1):129–142
Zhang H, Koda K (2021) Early oral language in Chinese heritage language reading development. Foreign Lang Ann. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12562
Zhang H, Roberts L (2021) A comparison of PIS and oddity test in measuring phonological awareness in L2 learners of Chinese. J Psycholinguist Res 50(2):375–396
Ziegler JC, Goswami U (2005) Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol Bull 131(1):3–29
Zou L, Desroches AS, Liu Y, Xia Z, Shu H (2012) Orthographic facilitation in Chinese spoken word recognition: an ERP study. Brain Lang 123(3):164–173
Acknowledgements
We thank the teachers and students for their participation in this study.
Funding
The study was funded by the National Science Foundation Project of China (Grant No.: 21CYY047).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The first author conducted the data analysis and created the tables and figures. The second author administered the study and provided his expertise for data analysis. Both authors wrote and edited the entire manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Ethics statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the author’s institution (Protocol number: HR182-2021).
Consent to participate and for publication
The participants provided their written informed consent to participate and for publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Handling Editor: Gladys Nyarko Ansah (University of Ghana).
Reviewers: George Akanlig-Pare (University of Ghana) and a second researcher who prefers to remain anonymous.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, J., Zhang, H. How phonological and orthographic decoding complicates the simple view of reading in Chinese: examining mediation through listening comprehension. Cogn Process (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01143-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01143-3